- #ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER DRIVER#
- #ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER SOFTWARE#
- #ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER CODE#
This would be reason enough for me to buy the thing at least. A180 3D/6G 3CH RC Airplane 2 Rc Flying Wing MCZ I used the standard prop that came with the kit with a stronger motor( Turnigy 2217 20turn 860 kv 22A Outr ) and not the standard one that they recommend Newsletter: mailings Z51 Predator 660mm Wingspan 2 Z51 Predator 660mm Wingspan 2.
#ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER CODE#
At this point the hardest part should be done (remember, I have no idea how complex all the other required changes to the code might be) and others might become interested in testing and contributing to this port.
#ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER DRIVER#
Somebody with the required motivation and skills would have to write a display driver based on the gathered information. If this would be likely to happen is up to anybody's imaginationįirst step would be to find out which display is used and how it is driven, if this information is not available one would have to probe the display with a logic analyzer and reverse engineer the protocol. If hobbyking would flash these with openTX by default if it was available for this radio, this could spark some interest. The question asked is clearly not if porting openTX to the T SIX is possible, but if it is worth the effort. This might be tricky, depending on how well if at all the display protocol is documented, e.g. However given that the processor is already supported and the integrated DSM2 module might use the original X1TXN protocol that is already implemented in openTX aswell, the main challenge remaining to get at least started on the T SIX would be to write a driver for the LCD. I DO NOT have any useful programming expertise, I'm just confident enough with Arduinos and MSP430s to run some basic sketches and to configure / tweak my MultiWii pocket quad, so my input on this is only theoretical and probably quite naive. I don't want to spend the $65 + shipping + tax at the moment, but i might have a weak moment on a late evening browsing HK in the near future IMHO definately a better TX than the DX6i assuming that hardware sustains use (there has been reports about failing LCDs) and definately not a copy or clone of the DX6i.Īnyway, It's well usable with the original firmware and apparently there is no interest for porting so there is no reason to go further.
#ORX TRANSMITTER TO TURNIGY RECEIVER SOFTWARE#
Overall I was quite impressed build quality is better than I've seen on any FlySky TX but not quite level of the name brands, the LCD is by far the best I've seen on any cheap TX, roller type ecoder works nicely, the sticks were about as good as in my best 9x but not as good as Aurora or Futaba sticks and the software was ok for the foamies/small helis. I had a ORX T-Six here for a while before passing it to a local heli guy. The pin use is probably quite bit different and difficult/time consuming to reverse engineer though. Given that the ATMEGA 128 is already supported and directly related to ATMEGA 64, I don't think that porting requires as much work as was needed for completely new processor like in the case of the Sky9X/Taranis. Looking at the effort required to properly port, debug and support the firmware to the Taranus and Sky9X boards.
0 kommentar(er)
